This is a fourth characteristic of good communication that
will be supposed it is added in our list. It should we clearly
show the one in the other that we cared, we respected and we
appreciate our companion. In no one it does not like ignoring,
him they face as ‘’me'ros epj'plwsis’’ or the considering datum.
Such something us bothers when eg to us is brought bad some
salesman s’ a shop, how many rather when us faces kat’ this way our
companion! We encourage lettered and action, we say
‘’eyharjstw'’’ or we express our estimate it is so much necessary but
also so much easily him we neglect.
8 At the handling of conflict they need more – but also are
tryed intensely – the communication faculties. Conflict s’ a
marriage it is likely and next to happen. Sometimes it concerns
common subjects and other objectives and their way of realisation.
It can exist conflicts of interests, opinions, opinions with
regard to the use of time or money, or even with the handling of
Often what is important for a individual, appears and so much
important for the other. What exists at depth, is the make that
two persons they have very different ideas with regard to the ‘’tj it
should gj'nej’’ and this threatens it activates big intensity.
Sometimes it includes conflict of wills and personalities.
If a pair does not learn ways to handle these situations the
conflict can become devastating and the communication becomes closed
and hostile. The observations that will become - s’ this case –
will be actually attacks against the other, despite comments above in
the subject that is discussed. Even if the two sides function
kat’ this way, they cannot be shared, n’ they hear and n’ they
correspond in the opinions the one of other. Will only exist
increasing anger and two persons s’ a one way road of not
communication, where each one tries it influences the other so that it
adopts his opinions.
In the devastating conflict the companion becomes opponent that
should it is overcome and katatropwcej' with possible means.
Does not exist place for respect, justice
and logic between equal. These recede front in bad spirit strations
of force, `'podopati'mata' ', raised voices, `'ntailj'kja'
', invocations of power and sometimes in ysterjka' outbreaks
of bodily sports . The things go from the villain
to the villain. Which initial subjects are lost
in in the general agitation, the conflict increases, the
misunderstandings are multiplied, nothing are not untied,
the hopes are shattered and in the withdrawl it is found
shelter. This does not give solution in nothing
and `'ma'hi' ' it is likely is continued some moment later,
in the future. Still however and if it is not continued,
the assembled and stored rancors and disappointments it
is likely they burden the pair in the future.
It should is found a better
way and this exists. At eayti'
conflict is not something villain. The
persons can aim at different ideas
and also via constructive exploration
of their differences, they can him
exeygenj'soyn and they improve together. Two
heads are better than the one and
combined efforts of beloved pair
are next to turn out more satisfactory
and effective compared to a pair
`'klejdwme'no' ' in devastating conflict.